检索范围:
排序: 展示方式:
Whole-life Thinking and Engineering the Future
Roger Flanagan
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2014年 第1卷 第3期 页码 290-296 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2014040
关键词: whole-life thinking systems thinking complexity chaos risk management through life
Rini NISHANTH, Andrew WHYTE, V. John KURIAN
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2018年 第5卷 第3期 页码 357-368 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2018022
Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units increasingly represent a practical and economic means for deep-water oil extraction and production. Systems thinking gives a unique opportunity to seek a balance between FPSO technical performance(s), with whole-cost; stakeholder decision-making is charged to align different fit-for-use design specification options’ that address technical-motion(s), with respective life-cycle cost analyses (LCCA). Soft system methodology allows situation based analyses over set periods-of-time by diagnosing the problem-at-hand; namely, assessing the antecedents of life-cycle cost relative to FPSO sub-component design alternatives. Alternative mooring- component comparisons for either new-build hulls or refurbished hulls represent an initial necessary consideration to facilitate extraction, production and storage of deep-water oil reserves. Coupled dynamic analysis has been performed to generate FPSO motion in six degrees of freedom using SESAM DeepC, while life-cycle cost analysis (LCAA) studies give net-present-value comparisons reflective of market conditions. A parametric study has been conducted by varying wave heights from 4 – 8 m to understand FPSO motion behavior in the presence of wind and current, as well as comparing the motions of turreted versus spread mooring design alternatives. LCCA data has been generated to compare the cost of such different mooring options/hull conditions over 10 and 25-year periods. Systems thinking has been used to explain the interaction of problem variables; resultantly this paper is able to identify explicit factors affecting the choice of FPSO configurations in terms of motion and whole-cost, toward assisting significantly with the front-end engineering design (FEED) phase of fit-for-purpose configured FPSOs, in waters off Malaysia and Australia.
关键词: FPSO LCCA spread/turret-mooring DeepC cost motion soft-systems
Peter E.D. LOVE, Hanbin LUO
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2018年 第5卷 第3期 页码 285-288 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2018205
Conceptualising the nexus of projects, finance and capacity in construction business
Arun BAJRACHARYA, Stephen Olu OGUNLANA, Cheng Siew GOH, Hai Chen TAN
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2018年 第5卷 第3期 页码 289-297 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2018021
This paper addresses a research question on why construction companies fail in their business. Starting with the concept of growth and capacity underinvestment archetype, a new and operational systems thinking model is developed. The conceptual systems thinking model includes a set of causal structure that can explain various modes (including the growth and failure modes) of business performance of small and medium construction companies. Mainly the three components – projects, finance and capacity – and the understanding of their nexus (or causal inter-relationships) are found to be sufficient to reveal different performance modes in construction business. Further, the three operational aspects, namely, the business growth or decline process; the situation of financial and other capacity resource consumption; and the management of projects, finance and other capacity resources have been identified as the inter-related core and integral aspects of construction business. The three inter-related core aspects could actually include and explain different possible range of business situations, policies and practices in a construction company.
关键词: performance of construction business projects finance capacity systems thinking
Strategic Thinking on Shallow-water Oil and Gas Exploration in Offshore China
Ke-qiang Wu,Jian-yong Xu,Bo Kang
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2016年 第3卷 第4期 页码 349-355 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2016056
关键词: offshore China shallow-water oil and gas exploration strategic thinking challenge countermeasure
Calling systematic thinking in addressing water security issues
Jining CHEN, Pengfei DU
《环境科学与工程前沿(英文)》 2013年 第7卷 第5期 页码 625-625 doi: 10.1007/s11783-013-0564-6
From systematicness to complexity: Fundamental thinking of mega-project management
Zhaohan SHENG, Han LIN
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2018年 第5卷 第1期 页码 125-127 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2018001
思维的两重性及其向创造性思维的转化 纪念钱学森院士《关于思维科学》发表15周年
梁桂明
《中国工程科学》 2003年 第5卷 第2期 页码 26-34
进入21世纪的新时代,带来与思维相关的两个特征:创新与共融。关于创新,如何激发创造性思维?成为热门的话题。从唯物辩证法的哲学的认识论和真理的相对性的高度来探索,发现任何一种思维形式(包括演绎法思维和定势-习惯思维)都具有两重性,即非创造性与创造性并存,在一定条件下,非创造性思维可以转化或激发为创造性思维,产生新知识,获得创新成果。关于共融,如何进行思维的界定和分类,有许多种说法。笔者把心理学与生理学的成果融合起来,形成两大类,即左半脑主导的理性思维和右半脑主导的悟性思维。其基本的思维形式的分类与思维的大类结合,成为两大类7种。把辩证法和共融结合,得到下列结论:理性思维与感性思维的统一,原有知识与新知识的统一,设想与验证的统一,发现与发明的统一,科学(真感)与艺术(美感)的统一。对最后一个结论,笔者以工业产品造型设计原理的探索为例加以说明。此原理在工业设计上属首次推出。
深度IA双向智能 Personal View
Lei XU
《信息与电子工程前沿(英文)》 2020年 第21卷 第4期 页码 558-562 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1900541
Huijun ZOU, Qinghua LIANG
《机械工程前沿(英文)》 2020年 第15卷 第3期 页码 430-437 doi: 10.1007/s11465-019-0583-5
关键词: traditional Chinese culture comprehensive thinking systematic analysis Needham’s Grand Question ancient Chinese scientific and technological achievements design driving innovation design theoretical thinking design dialectical methods
超越目标6.3:以一种系统分析方法来重新审视资源匮乏世界中的可持续发展目标
Qiong Zhang, Christine Prouty, Julie B. Zimmerman, James R. Mihelcic
《工程(英文)》 2016年 第2卷 第4期 页码 481-489 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.010
《2030 年可持续发展议程》概述了17 个独立的可持续发展目标(SDGs),用于指导世界范围内包括工程、科研、政策和发展在内的大量专业学科的实践。SDGs 致力于减少贫困、饥饿和疾病,同时致力于改善性别歧视、环境恶化以及水和卫生设施匮乏的现状。但是,如果我们采取传统的简化方法研究和优化其中的单一目标,很可能由于在实现其他目标时带来的意外后果,而导致在技术、政策或管理层面的失败。本研究采用系统分析方法研究SDGs 之间的动态机理,识别个体目标之间的协同或拮抗作用,构建了一个概念系统模型来说明SDGs 之间的因果联系,利用了通用系统基模来检验系统结构,确定了杠杆节点来有效控制系统中的预期变化并最小化非预期变化。SDGs 之间相互作用的结构反映了系统行为的三种基模:强化成长、成长上限和成长与投资不足。由概念模型确定的杠杆节点包括:性别平等、水和卫生设施的可持续管理、可替代资源、可持续生活标准和全球伙伴关系。这种对SDGs 的概念系统分析能够加深发展社区对资源管理、环境可持续发展和气候变化相关项目带来的潜在协同效应的理解。通过把项目间的影响和反馈与经济收益、妇女平权和教育平等联系起来,利益相关者可以意识到可从整体上改善全球众多贫困群体的生活质量。
Strategic Thinking on a Revolution/an Evolution in Production and Consumption of Energy in China
Ke-chang Xie,Ke Liu
《工程管理前沿(英文)》 2014年 第1卷 第1期 页码 30-36 doi: 10.15302/J-FEM-2014006
标题 作者 时间 类型 操作
Floating production storage and offloading systems’ cost and motion performance: A systems thinking application
Rini NISHANTH, Andrew WHYTE, V. John KURIAN
期刊论文
Systems thinking in construction: Improving the productivity and performance of infrastructure projects
Peter E.D. LOVE, Hanbin LUO
期刊论文
Conceptualising the nexus of projects, finance and capacity in construction business
Arun BAJRACHARYA, Stephen Olu OGUNLANA, Cheng Siew GOH, Hai Chen TAN
期刊论文
Strategic Thinking on Shallow-water Oil and Gas Exploration in Offshore China
Ke-qiang Wu,Jian-yong Xu,Bo Kang
期刊论文
From systematicness to complexity: Fundamental thinking of mega-project management
Zhaohan SHENG, Han LIN
期刊论文
Establishing distinctive theories and methods of design science rooted in Chinese traditional culture
Huijun ZOU, Qinghua LIANG
期刊论文
超越目标6.3:以一种系统分析方法来重新审视资源匮乏世界中的可持续发展目标
Qiong Zhang, Christine Prouty, Julie B. Zimmerman, James R. Mihelcic
期刊论文
Strategic Thinking on a Revolution/an Evolution in Production and Consumption of Energy in China
Ke-chang Xie,Ke Liu
期刊论文